![]() David Avrin, MD, PhD, a professor of clinical radiology and the vice chair for radiology informatics at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine, says radiology departments, until recently, didn't have enough confidence in the domain knowledge of EMR vendors about the ins and outs of radiology workflow to trust a RIS component of an EMR. "Regardless of what your feelings are about PACS/RIS vs EMR/RIS vs standalone RIS, the gravitational well of the EMR/RIS is pulling everybody to it."īut is that the best way to achieve interoperability and optimize workflow? Well, it depends. "Skip" Kennedy, MSc, CIIP, technical director of imaging informatics for Kaiser Permanente medical centers in northern California. And, more and more, it's CIOs who are picking radiology information systems," says R. "For a CIO considering the idea of integrating yet another system, as opposed to having the integration literally fall out of the box, is persuasive. For health care organizations that already use Epic's EMR, the lure of Radiant can be hard to resist. Epic offers Radiant as a component of its EMR. There are many reasons to adopt a RIS/EMR, but the biggest driver of the movement is Epic's Radiant RIS. Increasingly, the answer seems to be yes. ![]() To RIS/EMR or not to RIS/EMR? That's a question that more and more people are asking these days. A look at the changing relationship between RIS, PACS, and EMR.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |